| Author: | hyper active (registered user: 296 posts ) |
|---|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, May 30th, 2011 @ 16:50 ( . ) |
I wonder why syncr0l0k wasn't used on other titles. Perhaps some drives couldn't handle it. |
 | Author: | Lord Crass (guest: search) |
|---|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, May 30th, 2011 @ 19:39 ( . ) |
Expensive, I imagine. And since it's just a one-time check which isn't really integrated into the loader, it's fairly easy to crack. Even in the PC scene, this type of protection was quite rare and you usually only saw it on business apps. |